Journal of Research & Innovation in Anesthesia

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2017 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A Prospective, Pre- and Post-comparative Study to assess Knowledge about Medical Writing

Sweta Salgaonkar, Aditi Lakhotia, Anjana S Wajekar

Citation Information : Salgaonkar S, Lakhotia A, Wajekar AS. A Prospective, Pre- and Post-comparative Study to assess Knowledge about Medical Writing. Res Inno in Anesth 2017; 2 (1):1-3.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0021

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-06-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background

Medical writing is an important component of any research starting with writing a research protocol up to its culmination into presentations and publications. In spite of numerous mandatory academic projects being undertaken in India, the research output in peer-reviewed journals remains low. Lack of proficiency in medical writing has been cited as one of the important causes for same. We conducted a pre- and post-continued medical education (CME) multiple choice questions (MCQs) questionnaire test to assess the baseline knowledge of the participants in this field and observe their improvement after the CME.

Materials and methods

210 medical students and faculty from various medical disciplines participated in the workshop. Responses to a 15 item validated MCQs questionnaire under various headings such as literature search, spectrum of formats, statistics, references and reporting were collected from the participants of the CME.

Results

40.48% of the participants responded for pre-CME questionnaire forms and 36.67% for the post-CME questionnaire forms. In the post-CME questionnaire, a vast improvement was obtained in almost all questions, observed most prominently in the sections on literature search, referencing and reporting guidelines.

Conclusion

Training programs in medical writing should be included as a part of the curriculum from undergraduate days. Till the time that this becomes a reality, we should continue to equip ourselves with good medical writing skills by organizing such educative programs.

How to cite this article

Salgaonkar S, Wajekar AS, Lakhotia A. A Prospective, Pre- and Post-comparative Study to assess Knowledge about Medical Writing. Res Inno in Anesth 2017;2(1):1-3.


  1. Barriers to research activities from the perspective of the students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Acta Inform Med 2015 Jun;23(3):155-159.
  2. Essential components of educational programs on biomedical writing, editing, and publishing. J Korean Med Sci 2015 Oct;30(10):1381-1387.
  3. CONSORT revised – improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA 2001 Apr;285(15):2006-2007.
  4. Publish or perish: the art of scientific writing. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014 Nov;62(11):1089-1093.
  5. Literature review in biomedical research: useful search engines beyond PubMed. J Clin Epidemiol 2016 Mar;71:115-117.
  6. 2011 Canadian Journal of Anesthesia guide for authors. Can J Anesth 2011 Jul;58(7):668-696.
  7. Using research papers: citations, referencing and plagiarism. J Vis Commun Med 2012 Jun;35(2):82-84.
  8. The revised guidelines of the Medical Council of India for academic promotions: Need for a rethink. J Postgrad Med 2016 Apr-Jun;62(2):69-72.
  9. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med 2007 Jan;356(4):387-396.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.