Research & Innovation in Anesthesia

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery and Its Impact on Postoperative Pain and Length of Hospital Stay: An Initial Assessment

Saloni K Shah, Anita N Shetty

Keywords : Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, Enhanced recovery after surgery, Multimodal analgesia, Opioid-free anesthesia, Visual analog scale score

Citation Information : Shah SK, Shetty AN. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery and Its Impact on Postoperative Pain and Length of Hospital Stay: An Initial Assessment. Res Inno Anesth 2024; 9 (2):35-41.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10049-2057

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-12-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) spread to different surgical specialties to minimize surgical stress response, improve patient outcomes, and reduce the length of hospital stay (LOS). This study aimed to describe the early experience with an evidence-based ERAS pathway for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: This is a cohort study of retrospectively collected data. The ERAS pathway was created based on available evidence for anterior cervical spine surgery. Patients were followed up to postoperative day 30. Patient data were collected from a database, including demographics, pain score, postoperative complications, and LOS. Compliance with pathway elements was also noted. Results: Thirty-two patients were cared for under the pathway (n = 32). The median LOS was 44 hours, 26 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 41–46 hours]. Reasons for extended stay longer than 48 hours in six patients included pain (n = 2), dyspnea (n = 1), and dysphagia (n = 3). The median LOS for the six patients who required extended stay was 73 hours [IQR 64 hours 30 minutes–81 hours]. Overall pathway compliance was 83.49%. The median number of ERAS process elements delivered to each patient was 15. There were no complications requiring readmission. Conclusion: The ERAS pathway for ACDF represents an opportunity for safe, prompt discharge. The ERAS pathway can be associated with minimal complications and no readmissions within 30 days of surgery. Further comparative studies are required to confirm the potential benefits of ERAS and the reduction in LOS. Key message: Implementing ERAS protocols helps improve patient experience and outcomes, and reduces cost and LOS.


PDF Share
  1. Soffin EM, Wetmore DS, Barber LA, et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway: association with rapid discharge and minimal complications after anterior cervical spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2019;46(4):E9. DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18643
  2. Soffin EM, Wetmore DS, Beckman JD, et al. Opioid-free anesthesia within an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective matched cohort study. Neurosurg Focus 2019;46(4):E8. DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18645
  3. Soffin EM, Vaishnav AS, Wetmore DS, et al. Design and implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for minimally invasive lumbar decompression spine surgery: initial experience. Spine 2019;44(9):E561–E570. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002905
  4. Palumbo MA, Aidlen JP, Daniels AH, et al. Airway compromise due to wound hematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery. Open Orthop J 2012;6:108–113. DOI: 10.2174/1874325001206010108
  5. Tsalimas G, Evangelopoulos DS, Benetos IS, et al. Dysphagia as a postoperative complication of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Cureus 2022;14(7). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26888
  6. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker JJ, et al. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2005(3). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2
  7. Skovrlj B, Qureshi SA. Minimally invasive cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Sci 2017;61(3):325–334. DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03906-0
  8. Niijima K, Malis LI. Preventive superficial cervical plexus block for postoperative cervicocephalic pain in neurosurgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1993;33(6):365–367. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.33.365
  9. Teerawattananon C, Tantayakom P, Suwanawiboon B, et al. Risk of perioperative bleeding related to highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017;46(4):520–528. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.07.008
  10. Cha NH, Hu Y, Zhu GH, et al. Opioid-free anesthesia with lidocaine for improved postoperative recovery in hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2023;23(1):192. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02152-7
  11. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 2003;362(9399):1921–1928. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5
  12. Debono B, Corniola MV, Pietton R, et al. Benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery for fusion in degenerative spine surgery: impact on outcome, length of stay, and patient satisfaction. Neurosurg Focus 2019;46(4):E6. DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18669
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.