Research & Innovation in Anesthesia

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Comparison of Airway Assessment with Modified Mallampati Classification in Supine and Upright Positions in Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Observational Study

Manali Nadkarni, Shraddha S Mathkar, Neha Apte, Pradeep Tiwari

Keywords : Airway assessment, Difficult intubation, Modified Mallampati grade, Sitting position, Supine position

Citation Information : Nadkarni M, Mathkar SS, Apte N, Tiwari P. Comparison of Airway Assessment with Modified Mallampati Classification in Supine and Upright Positions in Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Observational Study. Res Inno Anesth 2022; 7 (2):42-47.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10049-2011

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-10-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Background: Modified Mallampati test is a standard method of assessing the airway for predicting potentially difficult laryngoscopy and intubation. It is performed in sitting position, while intubation is done in supine position. It is unclear whether a change in position while assessment of the Mallampati class causes significant changes in prediction of a difficult airway, and if it does, then whether we need to change our guidelines currently in place. Materials and methods: This prospective study was conducted in 350, ASA I and II patients undergoing various routine surgical procedures under general anesthesia, over a period of 18 months. The airway assessment was done using modified Mallampati grade in sitting and supine positions. Mallampati grade of III or IV was defined as the predictor of difficult airway. The laryngoscopy grade was assessed using the Cormack and Lehane grading scale. Grade III or IV of Cormack and Lehane grades was defined as the difficult laryngoscopy and assumed as the predictor of difficult intubation. Statistical measures including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were used for comparing the two positions for predicting difficult or ease of intubation. Results: Out of 350 patients, Mallampati grade III or IV was observed in more patients in a supine position compared to sitting position (12.29 vs 4.57%). Difficult laryngoscopy was observed in 23 (6.57%) patients. Sensitivity of modified Mallampati test was comparable in both the positions (sitting 97.55 vs supine 92.66%). Specificity was better in supine position as compared to sitting, 65.22 and 34.78%, respectively. Positive predictive value for difficult intubation in sitting position and supine positions were 95.5 and 97.43%, respectively, while negative predictive values were 50 and 38.46%. The diagnostic accuracy in both positions was comparable; sitting 93.43% and supine position 90.86%. The kappa agreement was 0.377 for sitting position and 0.437 for supine position, hence shows a fair agreement for both the sitting and supine positions in the prediction of difficult intubation. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between airway assessment conducted in sitting and supine positions. The modified Mallampati classification (MMC) in supine position can be used to predict difficult tracheal intubation with comparable efficacy as in the sitting position.

PDF Share
  1. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation; a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985;32(4):429–434. DOI: 10.1007/BF03011357
  2. Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987;42(5):487–490. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb04039.x
  3. Khan ZH, Eskandari S, Yekaninejad MS. A comparison of the Mallampati test in supine and upright positions with and without phonation in predicting difficult laryngoscopy and intubation: aprospective study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015;31(2):207–211. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.155150
  4. Bindra A, Prabhakar H, Singh GP, et al. Is the modified Mallampati test performed in supine position a reliable predictor of difficult tracheal intubation? J Anesth 2010;24(3):482–485. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-010-0905-6
  5. Khatiwada S, Bhattarai B, Pokharel K, et al. Comparison of modified Mallampati test between sitting and supine positions for prediction of difficult intubation. Health Renaissance 2012;10(1):12–15. DOI: 10.3126/hren.v10i1.6000
  6. Khan ZH. Airway assessment: a critical appraisal. Airway Management. Springer, Cham; 2014. pp. 15–32. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08578-4_2
  7. Hanouz JL, Bonnet V, Buléon C, et al. Comparison of the Mallampati classification in sitting and supine position to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective observational cohort study. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1): 161–169. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002108
  8. Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, et al. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2006;61(7):671–677. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04938.x
  9. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, et al. Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1990;72(5):828–833. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199005000-00010
  10. Van Holsbeke CS, Verhulst SL, Vos WG, et al. Change in upper airway geometry between upright and supine position during tidal nasal breathing. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2014;27(1):51–57. DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2012.1010
  11. Amadasun FE, Adudu OP, Sadiq A. Effects of position and phonation on oropharyngeal view and correlation with laryngoscopic view. Niger J Clin Pract 2010;13:417–420. DOI: 10.4314/NJCP.V13I4.64150
  12. Lewis M, Keramati S, Benumof JL, et al. What is the best way to determine oropharyngeal classification and mandibular space length to predict difficult laryngoscopy? Anesthesiology 1994;81:69–75. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199407000-00011
  13. Rosenstock C, Gillesberg I, Gätke MR, et al. Inter-observer agreement of tests used for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy/tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:1057–1062. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00792.x
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.