Journal of Research & Innovation in Anesthesia

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Combined Nerve Block and Topical Anesthesia: An Effective Alternate to General Anesthesia in Hybrid Balloon Sinuplasty Procedures

Sarika S Naik, Chaitra Venkategowda, Narasimha Reddy, Sudhir M Naik

Keywords : Hybrid balloon sinuplasty, Infraorbital nerve block, Maxillary nerve block

Citation Information : Naik SS, Venkategowda C, Reddy N, Naik SM. Combined Nerve Block and Topical Anesthesia: An Effective Alternate to General Anesthesia in Hybrid Balloon Sinuplasty Procedures. Res Inno in Anesth 2020; 5 (1):6-9.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0080

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-01-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background/objectives: Hybrid balloon sinuplasty (BSP) is recommended for chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis. Standalone BSP is an office-based procedure under local anesthesia. Materials and methods: We report a randomized study of patients operated with hybrid BSP under local and topical anesthesia in one group and the other group done under general anesthesia. Results: In the comparative analysis, local anesthesia hybrid procedures were more economical with equal symptoms improvement. Conclusion: The hybrid BSP procedure not only reduces the obstruction of chronic rhinosinusitis but also as a hybrid procedure addresses turbinates and deviated nasal septums. As such a complex procedure is done under local anesthesia while reducing the costs of hospitalization.


PDF Share
  1. Cingi C, Bayar Muluk N, Lee JT. Current indications for balloon sinuplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;27(1):7–13. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000506.
  2. Ahmed J, Pal S, Hopkins C, et al. Functional endoscopic balloon dilation of sinus ostia for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;7:CD008515. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008515. pub2.
  3. Batra PS, Ryan MW, Sindwani R, et al. Balloon catheter technology in rhinology: reviewing the evidence. Laryngoscope 2011;121(1):226–232. DOI: 10.1002/lary.21114.
  4. Nishioka GJ. The maxillary nerve block for in-office hybrid balloon sinus dilation procedures: a preliminary study. Ear Nose Throat J 2017;96(12):E31–E35. DOI: 10.1177/014556131709601207.
  5. Nishioka GJ. Modified in-office maxillary balloon sinus dilation for post-procedure sinus monitoring and access. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;22(1):68–72. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1601562.
  6. Mann WJ, Tóth M, Gouveris H, et al. The drainage system of the paranasal sinuses: a review with possible implications for balloon catheter dilation. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011;25(4):245–248. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3647.
  7. Migirov L, Yakirevitch A, Bedrin L, et al. Endoscopic sinus surgery for medial orbital subperiosteal abscess in children. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;38(4):504–508.
  8. Levine HL, Sertich AP, Hoisington DR, et al. Multicenter registry of balloon catheter sinusotomy outcomes for 1,036 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008;117(4):263–270. DOI: 10.1177/000348940811700405.
  9. Sillers MJ, Melroy CT. In-office functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis utilizing balloon catheter dilation technology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;21(1):17–22. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32835c05e1.
  10. Brodner D, Nachlas N, Mock P, et al. Safety and outcomes following hybrid balloon and balloon-only procedures using a multifunction, multisinus balloon dilation tool. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013;3(8):652–658. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21156.
  11. Ference EH, Graber M, Conley D, et al. Operative utilization of balloon vs traditional endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2015;125(1):49–56. DOI: 10.1002/lary.24901.
  12. Stankiewicz J, Truitt T, Atkins J, et al. Two-year results: transantral balloon dilation of the ethmoid infundibulum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012;2(3):199–206. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21024.
  13. Sikand A, Silvers SL, Pasha R, et al. Office-based balloon sinus dilation: 1-year follow-up of a prospective, multicenter study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2015;124(8):630–637. DOI: 10.1177/0003489415573830.
  14. Levine SB, Truitt T, Schwartz M, et al. In-office stand-alone balloon dilation of maxillary sinus ostia and ethmoid infundibula in adults with chronic or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multi-institutional study with-1-year follow-up. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122(11):665–671.
  15. Gould J, Alexander I, Tomkin E, et al. In-office, multisinus balloon dilation: 1-year outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, open label trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014;28(2):156–163. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4043.
  16. Koskinen A, Penttilä M, Salmi TS. Endoscopic sinus surgery might reduce exacerbations and symptoms more than balloon sinuplasty. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012;26(6):e150–e156. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3828.
  17. Plaza G, Eisenberg G, Montojo J, et al. Balloon dilation of the frontal recess: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120(8):511–518. DOI: 10.1177/000348941112000804.
  18. Khalid AN, Smith TL, Anderson JC, et al. Fracture of bony lamellae within the frontal recess after balloon catheter dilatation. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010;24(1):55–59. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3419.
  19. Bikhazi N, Light J, Schwartz M, et al. Standalone balloon dilation vs sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014;28(4):323–329. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4064.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.