Journal of Research & Innovation in Anesthesia

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2017 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison between Clinical Efficacies of Levobupivacaine Plain and Levobupivacaine with Fentanyl for Urological Surgeries under Subarachnoid Block

Aarti Kulkarni, Paulomi Dey

Citation Information : Kulkarni A, Dey P. Comparison between Clinical Efficacies of Levobupivacaine Plain and Levobupivacaine with Fentanyl for Urological Surgeries under Subarachnoid Block. Res Inno in Anesth 2017; 2 (2):34-39.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0030

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background and aims

Spinal anesthesia for urological operations has been frequently used, because symptoms of overhydration, transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) syndrome, and bladder perforation can be recognized. This prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the clinical efficacies of levobupivacaine with and without fentanyl in subarachnoid block with respect to onset and duration of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia in urological surgeries.

Materials and methods

This randomized study was conducted in 100 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grades I and II, posted for urological surgeries. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups and were given the following drugs intrathecally as per group distribution: Group I: 2.5 mL of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine and group II: 2.2 mL of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with 15 μg (0.3 mL) fentanyl citrate. Parameters monitored were onset and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesia, and side effects. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test for the continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.

Results

The onset of sensory level of T10 was earlier in group II (4.74 ± 0.723 minutes) than in group I (5.7 ± 0.953 minutes). Duration of sensory block was longer in group I (292.2 ± 8.154 minutes) than in group II (260 ± 11.066 minutes). Motor block regressed earlier in group II (181.2 ± 7.73 minutes) than in group I. Hemodynamic parameters and side effects were similar in both the groups.

Conclusion

From our study, we concluded that plain levobupivacaine provided a longer duration of sensory and motor subarachnoid blockade. However, addition of fentanyl as a spinal adjuvant had a dose-sparing effect with earlier onset and early regression of motor block and no hemodynamic alterations.

How to cite this article

Kulkarni A, Dey P. Comparison between Clinical Efficacies of Levobupivacaine Plain and Levobupivacaine with Fentanyl for Urological Surgeries under Subarachnoid Block. Res Inno in Anesth 2017;2(2):34-39.


  1. Miller's anaesthesia. 8th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Churchill Livingstone; 2015. pp. 2230-2231.
  2. Anaesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2009 Jun;9(3):92-96.
  3. Efficacy of office fulguration for recurrent low grade papillary bladder tumors less than 0.5 cm. J Urol 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):636-639.
  4. Comparison of levobupivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. J Res Med Sci 2013 May;18(5):378-382.
  5. Clinical profile of levobupivacaine in regional anaesthesia: a systematic review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013 Oct-Dec;29(4):530-539.
  6. Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2008 Apr;4(2):381-392.
  7. Pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical use of new long acting local anaesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Acta Biomed 2008 Aug;79(2):92-105.
  8. A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective caesarean sections. Anaesth Essays Res 2015 Jan-Apr;9(1):57-62.
  9. Hemodynamic impact of isobaric levobupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for subarachnoid anesthesia in patients aged 65 and older undergoing hip surgery. BMC Anaesthesiol 2014 Oct;14:97.
  10. Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery. The Eurasian J Med 2011 Aug;43(2):103-108.
  11. A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective caesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study. J Anesth 2011 Apr;25(2):205-212.
  12. Comparison of levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine with fentanyl in infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Anesth Essays Res 2015 May-Aug;9(2):178-184.
  13. The use of bupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia for urologic surgery. Anesth Analg 2000 Dec;91(6):1452-1456.
  14. Levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005 Dec;22(12):899-903.
  15. Intrathecal lipophilic opioids as adjuncts to surgical spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999 May-Jun;24(3):255-263.
  16. Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations. Saudi J Anaesth 2014 Jan;8(1):88-91.
  17. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg 2005 Jul;101(1):77-82.
  18. Comparison of the effects of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2003 Nov;92(5):684-689.
  19. Comparison of the anaesthetic effects of intrathecal levobupivacaine + fentanyl and bupivacaine + fentanyl during caesarean section. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2012 Feb;21(4):577-582.
  20. Comparison of intrathecal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine combined with opioids for Caesarean section. Curr Med Res Opin 2007 Dec;23(12):3047-3054.
  21. Comparison of two concentrations of isobaric intrathecal levobupivacaine for vaginal hysterectomy. Indian J Pain 2013;27(3):154-158.
  22. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003 Dec;31(6):637-641.
  23. Spinal anaesthesia: comparison of plain ropivacaine, bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2008 Jun;59(2):65-71.
  24. Spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection operations: levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2010 Feb;20(4):547-552.
  25. ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine coadministered with fentanyl for transurethral resections: randomized, double-blind trial. Drug Res 2015;65(1):24-29.
  26. The influence of small dose intrathecal fentanyl on shivering during transurethral resection of prostate under spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 1994 Sep;32(3):165-170.
  27. The anaesthetic and recovery profile of two concentrations (0.25% and 0.50%), of intrathecal isobaric Levobupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in patients undergoing modified Stark method caesarean delivery: a double blinded randomized trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013 Dec;17(23):3229-3236.
  28. Intrathecal fentanyl with small-dose dilute bupivacaine: better anesthesia without prolonging recovery. Anesth Analg 1997 Sep;85(3):560-565.
  29. Intrathecal opioids in the management of acute postoperative pain. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2008 Jun;8(3):81-85.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.