Journal of Research & Innovation in Anesthesia

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2017 ) > List of Articles


Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Array vs Endotracheal Intubation for Gynecological Diagnostic Laparoscopy

Valmik Avhad

Citation Information : Avhad V. Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Array vs Endotracheal Intubation for Gynecological Diagnostic Laparoscopy. Res Inno in Anesth 2017; 2 (1):9-13.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0023

License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).


PDF Share
  1. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a study of 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2003;47(6);467-472.
  2. The haemodynamic response to the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994 Jul;38(5):510-513.
  3. Complications of intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982 Nov-Dec;91(6 Pt 1):584-587.
  4. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002 Apr;88(4):527-533.
  5. Randomized comparative study between the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the endotracheal tube for laparoscopic surgery. Internet J Anaesthesiol 2006;11(1).
  6. Laryngo-pharyngeal complaints following laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 1997 Feb;9(1):42-47.
  7. Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. Tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 2000 Jul;47(7):622-626.
  8. Cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation or LMA removal in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Can J Anaesth 1997 Oct;44(10):1082-1086.
  9. The LMA-ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 2002 Oct;49(8):857-862.
  10. Physiological equilibria of gas cavities in the body. In:Fenn, WO, Rahn, M., editors. Handbook of physiology. Section 3: respiration. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society; 1965. p. 1205-1220.
  11. Pulmonary CO2 elimination during surgical procedures using intra-or extraperitoneal CO2 insufflation. Anesth Analg 1993 Mar;76(3):622-626.
  12. Gastric distension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy; comparison between ETT and PLMA. Internet J Anaesthesiol 2007;13(1).
  13. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2003 Jan;50(1):71-77.
  14. The larynx. In: The human anatomy, regional and applied. Vol. 3. p. 203-210.
  15. Tracheal tubes. Understanding anaesthesia equipment. p. 557-675.
  16. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In:Miller, RD., editor. Anesthesia. 7th edition. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 2185-2202.
  17. Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on the lower esophageal sphincter. Anesth Analg 1989 Jan;68(1):63-65.
  18. ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy. Anaesthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2004 Mar;39(3):132-137.
  19. The laryngeal mask: a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983 Aug;55(8):801-805.
  20. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: a meta-analysis of published literature. J Clin Anesth 1995 Jun;7(4):297-305.
  21. The LMA “ProSeal” – a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000 May;84(5):650-654.
  22. Endoscopic surgeryanaesthetic challenges – a historical review. Indian J Anaesth 2006 May;50(3):178-182.
  23. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000 Oct;91(4):1017-1020.
  24. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002 Jun;88(6):824-827.
  25. The Intavent laryngeal mask: instruction manual. Intavent Orthofix; 1993.
  26. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth 2000 Aug;85(2):262-266.
  27. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anaesthesiologists 2000 Jul;93(1):104-109.
  28. Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing patients: does size matter? Anesthesiology 2001 May;94(5):760-766.
  29. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection in male and female patients in an Asian population. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005 Apr;33(2):239-242.
  30. Responses of the gastroesophageal junctional zone to increases in abdominal pressure. Can J Surg 1966 Jan;9(1):32-38.
  31. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007 Feb;56:38-39.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.