Journal of Research & Innovation in Anesthesia

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2017 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Array vs Endotracheal Intubation for Gynecological Diagnostic Laparoscopy

Anita Shetty, Valmik Avhad

Citation Information : Shetty A, Avhad V. Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Array vs Endotracheal Intubation for Gynecological Diagnostic Laparoscopy. Res Inno in Anesth 2017; 2 (1):9-13.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0022

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-06-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

How to cite this article

Avhad V, Oak S, Shetty A. Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Array vs Endotracheal Intubation for Gynecological Diagnostic Laparoscopy. Res Inno in Anesth 2017;2(1):9-13.


  1. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a study of 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2003;47(6);467-472.
  2. The haemodynamic response to the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994 Jul;38(5):510-513.
  3. Complications of intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982 Nov-Dec;91(6 Pt 1):584-587.
  4. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002 Apr;88(4):527-533.
  5. Randomized comparative study between the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the endotracheal tube for laparoscopic surgery. Internet J Anaesthesiol 2006;11(1).
  6. Laryngo-pharyngeal complaints following laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 1997 Feb;9(1):42-47.
  7. Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. Tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 2000 Jul;47(7):622-626.
  8. Cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation or LMA removal in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Can J Anaesth 1997 Oct;44(10):1082-1086.
  9. The LMA-ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 2002 Oct;49(8):857-862.
  10. Physiological equilibria of gas cavities in the body. In: Fenn, WO, Rahn, M., editors. Handbook of physiology. Section 3: respiration. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society; 1965. p. 1205-1220.
  11. Pulmonary CO2 elimination during surgical procedures using intra- or extraperitoneal CO2 insufflation. Anesth Analg 1993 Mar;76(3):622-626.
  12. Gastric distension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy; comparison between ETT and PLMA. Internet J Anaesthesiol 2007;13(1).
  13. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2003 Jan;50(1):71-77.
  14. The larynx. In: The human anatomy, regional and applied. Vol. 3. p. 203-210.
  15. Tracheal tubes. Understanding anaesthesia equipment. p. 557-675.
  16. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In: Miller, RD., editor. Anesthesia. 7th edition. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 2185-2202.
  17. Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on the lower esophageal sphincter. Anesth Analg 1989 Jan;68(1):63-65.
  18. ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy. Anaesthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2004 Mar;39(3):132-137.
  19. The laryngeal mask: a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983 Aug;55(8):801-805.
  20. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: a meta-analysis of published literature. J Clin Anesth 1995 Jun;7(4):297-305.
  21. The LMA “ProSeal” – a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000 May;84(5):650-654.
  22. Endoscopic surgery-anaesthetic challenges – a historical review. Indian J Anaesth 2006 May;50(3):178-182.
  23. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000 Oct;91(4):1017-1020.
  24. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002 Jun;88(6):824-827.
  25. The Intavent laryngeal mask: instruction manual. Intavent Orthofix; 1993.
  26. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth 2000 Aug;85(2):262-266.
  27. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anaesthesiologists 2000 Jul;93(1):104-109.
  28. Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing patients: does size matter? Anesthesiology 2001 May;94(5):760-766.
  29. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection in male and female patients in an Asian population. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005 Apr;33(2):239-242.
  30. Responses of the gastroesophageal junctional zone to increases in abdominal pressure. Can J Surg 1966 Jan;9(1):32-38.
  31. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007 Feb;56:38-39.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.