CASE REPORT


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0104
Journal of Research and Innovations in Anaesthsia
Volume 6 | Issue 2 | Year 2021

Anesthesia Management in a Case of Restrictive Lung Disease


Shruti Hazari1, Parthkumar Hirpara2, Mankeerat Kaur3, Raghbirsingh Gehdoo4, Varsha H Vyas5, Jayshree P Vashwani6

1–6Department of Anesthesia, Dr DY Patil Medical College and Hospital, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Corresponding Author: Parthkumar Hirpara, Department of Anesthesia, Dr DY Patil Medical College and Hospital, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, Phone: +91 7874213149, e-mail: parth9087@gmail.com

How to cite this article Hazari S, Hirpara P, Kaur M, et al. Anesthesia Management in a Case of Restrictive Lung Disease. Res Inno in Anesth 2021;6(2):49–50.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

ABSTRACT

Anesthesia management in a case of restrictive lung disease especially interstitial lung disease (ILD) poses many challenges to anesthesiologists as these patients have decreased lung compliance and volumes with preservation of expiratory flow rates. These patients present with rapid and shallow breathing patterns with alteration in respiratory gas exchange and V/Q mismatch which causes an increase in perioperative complications.

Case description: An 86-year-old man weighing 106 kg k/c/o diabetes and hypertension controlled on medications was posted for bilateral hernioplasty. He had been operated on for CABG and spine surgery with instrumentation at the lumbar region. The patient had shallow and rapid breathing. SpO2 on room air 92%. PFT revealed severe restrictive pattern; chest X-ray pa view showed hazy opacities over both lung fields CT scan suggestive of interstitial pneumonia. 2D echo showed LVEF 50–55% and hypokinetic distal interventricular septum. Due to huge inguinoscrotal swelling, the inguinal block was not feasible, spine surgery was a contraindication for neuraxial block, hence general anesthesia was the technique of choice. The patient was optimized by nebulization with duolin and budecort, antiplatelets stopped as per the cardiologist’s opinion. Premedication with midazolam 0.5 mg iv and fentanyl 100 μg iv. Propofol was used for induction. Intubation was done with an 8 mm ID endotracheal tube using 40 mg iv atracurium and maintained on oxygen, air, and isofluorane. The patient was converted to pressure control with pressure settings between 20 and 25 cmH2O which delivered 300 mL tidal volume approximately. Saturation was maintained to 100% and end-tidal CO2 remained between 32 and 35 intraoperatively. The patient was electively ventilated to reduce work of breathing in a k/c/o ILD with prolonged exposure to anesthesia, hypothermia, electrolyte imbalance as the gradual weaning process is beneficial for such patients. The anesthesia management of ILD cases requires proper preoperative assessment and optimization and proper choice of anesthesia.

Keywords: High BMI, Inguinal hernia, Interstitial lung disease, Post CABG, Restrictive lung disease.

Restrictive lung diseases are characterized by reduced lung volumes, either because of an alteration in lung parenchyma or because of a disease of the pleura, chest wall, or neuromuscular apparatus. Unlike obstructive lung diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which show a normal or increased total lung capacity (TLC), restrictive diseases are associated with a decreased TLC.

Restrictive lung diseases may be caused by the destruction of distal lung parenchyma due to infiltrates from inflammation, toxins, and mechanisms yet to be elucidated (intrinsic conditions) as well as extra parenchymal conditions (extrinsic causes).1

Anesthesia management in a case of restrictive lung disease especially interstitial lung disease (ILD) poses many challenges to anesthesiologists as these patients have decreased lung compliance and volumes with preservation of expiratory flow rates. These patients present with rapid and shallow breathing patterns with alteration in respiratory gas exchange and V/Q mismatch which causes an increase in perioperative complications (Fig. 1).

The anesthesia management of ILD cases requires proper preoperative assessment and optimization and proper choice of anesthesia.

We described successful anesthetic management of a patient operated for bilateral hernioplasty with DM, HTN as comorbidities.

CASE DESCRIPTION

An 86-year-old man weighing 106 kg k/c/o diabetes and hypertension controlled on medications was posted for bilateral hernioplasty. He had been operated on for CABG and spine surgery with instrumentation at the lumbar region. The patient had shallow and rapid breathing.

Fig. 1: Large bilateral inguinal hernia

SpO2 on room air 92%. HR–98 bpm, regular, BP–140–90 mm Hg, RR 24 per minute.

Bilateral fine crackles on chest auscultation.

PFT revealed severe restrictive pattern; chest X-ray pa view showed hazy opacities over both lung fields CT scan suggestive of interstitial pneumonia. 2D echo showed LVEF 50–55% and hypokinetic distal Interventricular septum.

Anesthetic Management

The patient was optimized by nebulization with duolin and budecort, antiplatelets stopped as per the cardiologist’s opinion, and reservation of ICU and ventilator, the patient was planned for general anesthesia due to huge inguinoscrotal swelling, the inguinal block was not feasible, spine surgery was a contraindication for neuraxial block, hence general anesthesia was the technique of choice.

Premedication with midazolam 0.5 mg iv and fentanyl 100 μg iv.

Propofol was used for induction.

Intubation was done with an 8 mm ID endotracheal tube using 40 mg iv atracurium and maintained on oxygen, air, and isofluorane.

Volume control mode at tv-480 mL, PEEP-5, RR-16 increased the peak pressures up to 38 cmH2O.

So, the ventilator settings were changed and converted to pressure control with pressure settings between 28 cmH2O which delivered 300 mL tidal volume approximately.

Saturation was maintained to 100% and end-tidal CO2 remained between 32 and 35 intraoperatively.

Postoperative

The patient was electively ventilated to reduce work of breathing in a k/c/o ILD with prolonged exposure to anesthesia, hypothermia, electrolyte imbalance as the gradual weaning process is beneficial for such patients.

DISCUSSION

Patients with restrictive respiratory disorders are at high risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. It is not uncommon for patients with chronic restrictive respiratory disorders to present for a surgical procedure. In one study, the prevalence of a restrictive spirometric pattern on pulmonary function testing was approximately 7–11%, similar to the prevalence of a spirometric pattern indicating COPD.

Conditions that may cause such restriction to include:

The lung-protective strategy was used in patients with pulmonary fibrosis, which include limiting the inspiratory pressure to not >30 mm Hg, limit the tidal volume to not >8 mL/kg to avoid barotrauma and volutrauma.2,3

We chose to do intubation with ETT over supraglottic device because the disadvantages of supraglottic devices with inflatable cuff include, tissue distortion, venous compression, nerve injury, and increased incidence of postoperative morbidity.4 The causes of postoperative morbidity of supraglottic devices with inflatable cuff include, trauma during insertion, multiple attempts, the pressure exerted by cuff against the pharyngeal mucosa, cuff volumes, and cuff pressure.57

CONCLUSION

The anesthesia management of ILD cases requires proper preoperative assessment and optimization and proper choice of anesthesia along with intraoperative vigilance and postoperative intensive care management.

REFERENCES

1. Martinez-Pitre PJ, Sabbula BR, Cascella M. Restrictive Lung Disease, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560880/.

2. Mollica C, Paone G, Conti V, et al. Mechanical ventilation in patients with end-stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiration 2010;79(3):209–215. DOI: 10.1159/000225932.

3. Hoegl S, Boost K, Flondor M, et al. Short-term exposure to high-pressure ventilation leads to pulmonary biotrauma and systemic inflammation in the rat. Int J Mol Med 2008;21(4):513–519. DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.21.4.513.

4. Grady DM, McHardy F, Wong J, et al. Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing patients: does size matter? Anesthesiology 2001;94(5):760–766. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200105000-00012.

5. Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2008;63(10):1124–1130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05561.x.

6. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, et al. Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and female. Anesthesiology 2000;93(1):26–31. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00009.

7. Burgard G, Möllhoff T, Prien T. The effect of laryngeal mask cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat incidence. J Clin Anesth 1996;8(3):198–201. DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00229-4.

________________________
© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.